Cutaia v Board of Mgrs.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Cutaia v Board of Mgrs. of the 160/170 Varick St. 2018 NY Slip Op 34254(U) August 8, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 155334/2012 Judge: Carol R. Edmead Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/09/2018 11:08 AM A~ffv'Dti] NYSCEF DOC. NO. 290 oRDEf.__ INDEX NO. 155334/2012 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/09/2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: /do,1, Guo( PART_3_r;-_ Justice INDEX NO. ~ d fl -v- °5)5 31 lcJ. MOTION DATE 1= cJf ~- MOTIONSEQNO ~ Of r) The f~~ng p,~:. n u ~ wera~adon llils m:tion tono, _ _ _ _ _ _A_M_E_N_D_E_D __o_RD __E_R Notice of Motion/Order to Show Cause Answering Affidavits - Affidavits - Exhibits Exhibits _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Replying Affidavits _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ I No(s)._ _ _ _ __ I No(s). _ _ _ _ __ I No(s). _ _ _ _ __ Upon the foregoing papers, it is ordered that this motion is The court's decision and order dated August 3, 2018 is modified to the extent that the branch of plaintiff's motion seeking partial summary judgment as to liability on his Labor Law§ 241 (6) claim is granted as against defendants The Rector, Church Wardens and Vestrymen of Trinity Church in the City of New York, Michilli Construction, Inc., and Michilli Inc. is granted, while the branch seeking summary judgment on his Labor Law§ 240 (1) claim, and the remainder of the motion is denied. w 0 j::: en ::, -, 0 I- 0 w c::: c::: w LL w a: >...J ...J ::, LL en z0 en < w w 0:: I- 0 C. en (!) w z c::: ~ ~ 0 w ...J en ...J < 0LI. 0 z 0 w :c Ij::: 0:: 0 a~~-S.C 0 . :ii: Lt.. _/ HON. CAR L . E D ~ . J 1. CHECK ONE: ..................................................................... 0 CASE DISPOSED 2. CHECK AS APPROPRIATE: ........................... MOTION IS: 0 0 GRANTED 3. CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: ................................................ ODONOTPOST [* 1] 1 of 1 O GRANTED IN PART • OTHER O SUBMIT ORDER 0 FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT O REFERENCE O DENIED SETTLE ORDER J.S.C. !l!:] NON-FINAL DISPOSITION

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.