MLF3 NWJ LLC v Signature Group Invs. LLC

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

MLF3 NWJ LLC v Signature Group Invs. LLC 2017 NY Slip Op 31892(U) September 5, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 152140/2016 Judge: Kathryn E. Freed Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various state and local government websites. These include the New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts Service, and the Bronx County Clerk's office. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. [*FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/2017 03:06 PM 1] NYSCEF DOC. NO. 68 INDEX NO. 152140/2016 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: PART HON. KATHRYN E. FREED Justice 2 --- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X MLF3 NWJ LLC, INDEX NO. 152140/2016 Plaintiff, MOTION DATE MOTION SEQ. NO. -vSIGNATURE GROUP INVESTMENTS LLC, SIGNATURE COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT LLC, SIGNATURE COMMUNITY INVESTMENT GROUP LLC, NICKOLAS JEKOGIAN 001 DECISION ORDER AND JUDGMENT Defendant. ----------------------~-----------------------------------------------------X The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number 2, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39,40,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67 were read on this application to/for Enforce Judgment ~-------------------~ Upon the foregoing documents, it is Ordered that the petition is granted in part. This is a special proceeding by petitioner MLFJ NWJ LLC to enforce a judgment entered in this court in the amount of $1,569,013.87 against respondent, Nickolas W. Jekogian III (Jekogian). Respondent opposes the petition. After oral argument, and after a review of the parties' papers and the relevant statutes and case law, the petition is granted in part. Page 1of6 1 of 6 [*FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/2017 03:06 PM 2] NYSCEF DOC. NO. 68 INDEX NO. 152140/2016 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2017 Background Petitioner is the assignee of a judgment creditor who entered a judgment ("the New York Judgment") against Jekogian in this Court in September, 2014. Such judgment originated from a judgment entered against Jekogian in the State of Virginia. The original judgment was obtained after the underlying defendant, Drexel Property Group, LLC, defaulted on a promissory note regarding real property located in Virginia, which note was personally guaranteed by Jekogian. In March 2016, petitioner commenced the instant special proceeding to enforce the New York Judgment. The respondents are Jekogian and three companies in which he allegedly has a controlling ownership interest: Signature Group Investments, LLC, Signature Community Management, LLC and Signature Community Investment Group, LLC (collectively "the Companies"). The petition seeks the turnover of any funds held by any of the Companies on Jekogian's behalf, as well as payment to petitioner of any debts owed by any of the Companies to Jekogian. The petition further seeks to charge Jekogian's membership interest in any or all of the Companies with payment of the New York Judgment. The petition also seeks the appointment of a receiver to administer and collect any distributions made to Jekogian by the Companies, and the granting of quarterly inspections of the books and records of the Companies. The parties sharply dispute whether Jekogian has a controlling ownership interest in any of the Companies. However, it is undisputed that he has at least a 1% ownersh_ip interest in each of the Companies. Page 2of6 2 of 6 [*FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/2017 03:06 PM 3] NYSCEF DOC. NO. 68 INDEX NO. 152140/2016 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2017 Analysis CPLR 5225 (b), 5227 Petitioner seeks an order, pursuant to CPLR 5225 (b ), directing the Companies to tum over to petitioner any funds held on behalf of Jekogian in full or partial satisfaction of the New York Judgment. CPLR 5225 (b) provides, in relevant part, that Upon a special proceeding commenced by the judgment creditor, against a person in possession or custody of money or other personal property in which the judgment debtor has an interest, or against a person who is a transferee of money or other personal property from the judgment debtor, where it is shown that the judgment debtor is entitled to the possession of such property or that the judgment creditor's rights to the property are superior to those of the transferee, the court shall require such person to pay the money, or so much of it as is sufficient to satisfy the judgment to the judgment creditor and, if the amount to be so paid is insufficient to satisfy the judgment, to deliver any other personal property, or so much of it as is of sufficient value to satisfy the judgment, to a designated sheriff. .. Since petitioner has failed to identify any specific property or money being held by the Companies on behalf of Jekogian, this branch of the petition is denied. Petitioner further seeks an order, pursuant to CPLR 5227, directing the Companies to pay to the petitioner any debt owed to Jekogian in full or partial satisfaction of the New York Judgment and to execute and deliver any document necessary to effectuate such payment to petitioners' counsel. CPLR 5227 provides that, in certain cases, "[ u]pon a special proceeding commenced by the judgment creditor, against any person who it is shown is or will become indebted to the judgment debtor, the court may require such person to pay to the judgment creditor the debt upon maturity, or so much of it as is sufficient to satisfy the judgment.. .. " Page 3of6 3 of 6 [*FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/2017 03:06 PM 4] NYSCEF DOC. NO. 68 INDEX NO. 152140/2016 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2017 Here, the petition fails to identify the existence of any specific debts owed by any of the Companies to Jekogian. Therefore, this portion of the petition is denied . .- Limited Liability Company Law § 607 Petitioner also moves, pursuant to New York's Limited Liability Company Law§ 607, for an order charging the membership interests of Jekogian in the respondent Companies with payment of the Judgment. This section provides that:. (a) On application to a court of competent jurisdiction by any judgment creditor of a member, the court may charge the membership interest of the member with payment of the unsatisfied amount of the judgment with interest. To the extent so charged, the judgment creditor has only the rights of an assignee of the membership interest. This chapter does not deprive any member of the benefit of any exemption laws applicable to his or her membership interest. (b) No creditor of a member shall have any right to obtain possession of, or otherwise exercise legal or equitable remedies with respect to, the property of the limited liability company. "A plain reading of Sections 603(a) and 607 of the Limited Liability Company Law makes it clear that, at best, a creditor... may only obtain an interest in a member's share of the profits and losses of a limited liability company, not the membership interest itself." Born to Build, LLC v Saleh, 43 Misc 3d 1213(A) 2014 NY Slip Op. 50594(U), *4 (Sup Ct Nassau County, 2014). Here, the parties dispute how much of an ownership interest Jekogian has in the Companies. Jekogian has conceded that he has a 1% ownership interest in each of the Companies. Petitioner has submitted some evidence indicating that Jekogian's ownership interest in one or more of the Companies may be greater, but petitioner has not adequately demonstrated exactly what such membership interest in any of the Companies is, beyond the 1% not in dispute. Page 4of6 4 of 6 [*FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/2017 03:06 PM 5] NYSCEF DOC. NO. 68 INDEX NO. 152140/2016 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2017 Given that Jekogian is indisputably at least a 1% member of each of the Companies, petitioner is entitled to an order, pursuant to LLC § 607, charging Jekogian's membership interests with payment of the New York Judgment from any profits or other distributions made to Jekogian pursuant to such membership interests. Therefore, this portion of the petition is granted. CPLR 5228 Finally, petitioner moves, pursuant to CPLR 5228, for an Order directing the appointment of a receiver by the court to administer and collect any distributions to Jekogian and granting the quarterly inspection of the books and records of the Companies. CPLR 5228 (a) provides that Upon motion of a judgment creditor, ... the court may appoint a receiver who may be authorized to administer, collect, improve, lease, repair or sell any real or personal property in which the judgment debtor has an interest or to do any other acts designed to satisfy the judgment. Whether to appoint a receiver is within the court's discretion and should only be granted where "a special reason appears to justify one." Hotel 71 Mezz Lender LLC v Falor, 14 NY3d 303, 317 (2010), internal quotation marks and citation omitted. "In deciding whether the appointment of receiver is justified, courts have considered the '(I) alternative remedies available to the creditor. .. ; (2) the degree to which receivership will increase the likelihood of satisfaction ... ; and (3) the risk of fraud or insolvency if a receiver is not appointed."' Id. at 317, citation omitted. Here, petitioner has not demonstrated that appointment of a receiver is appropriate. As set forth above, the petition fails to demonstrate the existence of funds currently held on Jekogian's Page 5of6 5 of 6 [*FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/2017 03:06 PM 6] NYSCEF DOC. NO. 68 INDEX NO. 152140/2016 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2017 I behalf by the Companies, or the existence of any debts owed to him by the Companies. Thus, a receiver is not required in the context of such items. Although petitioner has demonstrated its entitlement to a charging order directing the Companies to turn over any distributions that may become payable to Jekogian, it has not demonstrated that such charging order is insufficient to enforce petitioner's rights to such payments, such as would require the appointment of a receiver. Therefore" in light of the foregoing, it is hereby: ADJUDGED that petitioner MLF3 NWJ LLC;s petition is granted to the extent that petitioner shall be entitled, as an assignee, to respondent Nickolas W. Jekogian, Ill's membership interest in any profits or distributions made by respondents Signature Group Investments, LLC, Signature Community Management, LLC and Signature Community Investment Group, LLC; and it is further ADJUDGED that the petition is otherwise denied; and it is further ORDERED that this constitutes the decision and order of the court. 9/5/2017 DATE CHECK ONE: KATHRYN E. FREED J.S.C. CASE DISPOSED GRANTED D NON-FINAL DISPOSITION DENIED GRANTED IN PART APPLICATION: SETTLE ORDER SUBMIT ORDER CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: DO NOT POST FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT D D OTHER REFERENCE Page 6of6 6 of 6

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.