Commissioners of the State Ins. Fund v Lawrence LaRose Constructions, LLC
Annotate this CaseDecided on December 11, 2008
Supreme Court, Suffolk County
Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund, Plaintiff,
against
Lawrence LaRose Constructions, LLC, Defendant.
23538-08
MAIDENBAUM & ASSOC., PLLC
Attys. For Plaintiff
1 Broadcast Plaza
Merrick, NY 11566
LAWRENCE LaROSE CONSTR., LLC
Defendant Pro Se
21 West Dr.
Sag Harbor, NY 11963
Thomas F. Whelan, J.
ORDERED that this motion (#
001) by the defendant for an order vacating its default in answering the plaintiff's
summons and [*2]complaint, is considered under CPLR 321 and
5015 and is denied.
The record adduced on this motion reveals that the plaintiff commenced this action to recover monies due from the defendant, Lawrence LaRose Constructions, LLC , for unpaid premiums and surcharges due the plaintiff by reason of the defendant's alleged employment of uninsured subcontractors. On September 9, 2008, a default judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant in the amount of $4,445.02 by the Clerk of the Court.
By the instant motion, Lawrence LaRose, a non-party to this action, moves for an order vacating the default judgment obtained by the plaintiff against the defendant in September, 2008. For the reasons set forth below, said motion is denied.
CPLR 321 prohibits a corporation or voluntary association to appear in an action other than by counsel, except in certain limited circumstances not applicable to this court (see CPLR 321[a]). Recent Appellate authority has instructed that an LLC, like a corporation or voluntary association, is created to shield its members from liability and once formed, is a legal entity distinct from its members (see Michael Reilly Design, Inc. v Houraney, 40 AD3d 592, 835 NYS2d 640 [2d Dept 2007]). Consequently, an LLC, like a corporation or a voluntary association, may only appear in an action governed by CPLR 321 by an attorney and not by one of its members, who is not an attorney admitted to practice in this State (see Ibid at 40 AD3d 593-594).
Here, the instant motion (#
001) to vacate the default judgment previously entered against the defendant,
Lawrence LaRose Constructions, LLC, was interposed by one Lawrence LaRose, a non-party to
this action who has appeared herein in a self-represented capacity. While it appears that the
movant has some relationship to the defendant, it is equally apparent that he is acting in a
self-represented capacity and is not an attorney at law duly licensed to practice in this State.
Under these circumstances, the court denies the instant motion to vacate the judgment
previously entered against the defendant on the grounds that it lacks jurisdiction to determine the
merits thereof by reason of the improper appearance of the defendant by one other than an
attorney duly licensed to practice law in this State.
DATED: ________________________________________________
THOMAS F. WHELAN, J.S.C.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.