Gravano v Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
Annotate this CaseDecided on March 29, 2018
No. 23
[*1]Karen Gravano, Appellant,
v
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. et al., Respondents.
Thomas A. Farinella, for appellant.
Jeremy Feigelson, for respondents.
Jarryd Huntley; Motion Picture Association of America, Inc. et al.; Entertainment Software Association; American Booksellers Association, et al.; Eric M. Freedman, et al., amici curiae.
MEMORANDUM:
The order of the Appellate Division, insofar as appealed from, should be affirmed, with costs. A computer-generated image may constitute a "portrait" within the meaning of Civil Rights Law §§ 50 and 51 (see Lohan v Take-Two Interactive Software, ___ NY3d ___, ___ [2018] [decided herewith]). Plaintiff, however, is not recognizable from the images at issue here, namely, the "Andrea Bottino" avatar in the video game in question (see Cohen v Herbal Concepts, 63 NY2d 379, 384 [1984]).
In view of our determination, we do not address plaintiff's additional contentions.
Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia and Feinman concur. Judge Wilson took no part.
Decided March 29, 2018
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.