Matter of Castro v Schriro

Annotate this Case
Matter of Castro v Schriro 2017 NY Slip Op 04323 Decided on June 1, 2017 Court of Appeals Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 1, 2017
No. 88 SSM 13

[*1]In the Matter of Raymond Castro, Respondent,

v

Dora Schriro, & c., et al. Appellants.



Submitted by Ingrid R. Gustafson, for appellants.

Submitted by Liam L. Castro, for respondent.



On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative. Under the circumstances presented, the Appellate Division correctly held that the petition stated a claim for improper termination. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia and Wilson concur.

Decided June 1, 2017



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.