Bennett v Hucke

Annotate this Case
Bennett v Hucke 2016 NY Slip Op 05904 Decided on August 30, 2016 Court of Appeals Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on August 30, 2016
No. 190 SSM 16

[*1]Joseph Bennett, & c., Appellant, et al., Plaintiff,

v

Michael Hucke, et al., Defendants, Alan Kirk, et al., Respondents.



Submitted by James Edward Gathman, Jr., for appellant.

Submitted by Timothy F. Mazzara, for respondents.



On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules (22 NYCRR 500.11), order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs. Plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact whether defendants-respondents Alan Kirk, et al. are subject to general contractor liability for when James Bennett was injured.

Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur.

Decided August 30, 2016



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.