Catalano v Tanner

Annotate this Case
Catalano v Tanner 2014 NY Slip Op 04045 Decided on June 5, 2014 Court of Appeals Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 5, 2014
No. 174 SSM 9

[*1]Joseph Catalano et al., Appellants,

v

Laurie Tanner, & c., Respondent.



Submitted by Jacob A. Piorkowski, for appellants.

Submitted by Laurence D. Behr, for respondent.



On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order reversed, with costs, and defendant's motion for summary judgment denied. Defendant failed to establish prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law concerning the reasonableness of her inspection practices. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.

Decided June 5, 2014



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.