People v Webb
Annotate this Case
People v Webb
2014 NY Slip Op 03194
Decided on May 6, 2014
Court of Appeals
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on May 6, 2014
No. 142 SSM 37
[*1]The People & c., Appellant,
v
James F. Webb, Respondent.
Submitted by William G. Zickl, for appellant.
Submitted by Jeremy D. Schwartz, for respondent.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People, the evidence was legally insufficient to establish a conviction for criminal contempt in the first degree. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.
Decided May 6, 2014
Decided on May 6, 2014
No. 142 SSM 37
[*1]The People & c., Appellant,
v
James F. Webb, Respondent.
Submitted by William G. Zickl, for appellant.
Submitted by Jeremy D. Schwartz, for respondent.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People, the evidence was legally insufficient to establish a conviction for criminal contempt in the first degree. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.
Decided May 6, 2014
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
