Gyabaah v Rivlab Transp. Corp.

Annotate this Case
Gyabaah v Rivlab Transp. Corp. 2013 NY Slip Op 08375 Decided on December 17, 2013 Court of Appeals Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 17, 2013
No. 257 SSM 32

[*1]Adwoa Gyabaah, Respondent,

v

Rivlab Transportation Corp., Appellant, et al., Defendant, Jeffrey A. Aronsky, P.C. Nonparty-Respondent.




Submitted by Elizabeth Gelfand Kastner, for appellant.
Submitted by Barry Liebman, for respondent.
Submitted by Brian J. Isaac, for nonparty-respondent.


MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative.

This action was not settled because the general release and the hold harmless [*2]agreement were never delivered to defendant, nor was the acceptance of the settlement offer otherwise communicated to defendant or its carrier (see White v Corlies, 46 NY 467, 469 [1871]).
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Rivera concur. Judge Abdus-Salaam took no part.
Decided December 17, 2013

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.