Eva Flores v. Langsam Property Services Corp.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
================================================================= This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------No. 207 SSM 39 Eva Flores, Appellant, v. Langsam Property Services Corp., et al., Respondents. Submitted by Steven I. Brizel, for appellant. Submitted by Patrick W. Brophy, for respondents. MEMORANDUM: The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. Plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact regarding defendants' actual or constructive notice of the particular dangerous condition that allegedly caused her injuries - 1 - - 2 - SSM No. 39 (see Gordon v American Museum of Natural History, 67 NY2d 836, 838 [1986]). * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur. Decided October 20, 2009 - 2 -
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
