DeJesus v New York City Hous. Auth.

DeJesus v New York City Hous. Auth. 2008 NY Slip Op 09863 [11 NY3d 889] December 18, 2008 Court of Appeals Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, March 4, 2009

[*1] Ines DeJesus, Appellant,
v
New York City Housing Authority, Respondent.

Decided December 18, 2008

DeJesus v New York City Hous. Auth., 53 AD3d 410, affirmed.

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Trolman, Glaser & Lichtman, P.C., New York City (Michael T. Altman of counsel), for appellant.

Cullen and Dykman LLP, Brooklyn (Joseph Miller of counsel), for respondent.

{**11 NY3d at 890} OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs. In this slip and fall case, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact that defendant caused or created, or had constructive notice of a dangerous recurring condition.{**11 NY3d at 891}

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.