People v Packer

Annotate this Case
People v Packer 2008 NY Slip Op 05774 [10 NY3d 915] June 25, 2008 Court of Appeals Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. As corrected through Wednesday, August 20, 2008

[*1] The People of the State of New York, Appellant,
v
Andrew Packer, Respondent.

Decided June 25, 2008

People v Packer, 49 AD3d 184, affirmed.

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York City (Eric Rosen and Sheryl Feldman of counsel), for appellant.

Legal Aid Society, New York City (Ellen Dille of counsel), for respondent.

{**10 NY3d at 916} OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The court's determinationthat defendant's consent was involuntarily given because it was insufficiently distinguishable from the illegal friskfinds record support. The People's contention that the court applied an erroneous legal standard is unavailing. [*2]

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, in a memorandum. .

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.