Matter of Elliott v Butler

Annotate this Case
Matter of Elliott v Butler 2007 NY Slip Op 03960 [8 NY3d 972] May 8, 2007 Court of Appeals Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. As corrected through Wednesday, June 20, 2007

[*1] In the Matter of Rodney Elliott, Appellant,
v
Sheryl Butler, as Deputy Superintendent of Programs, Eastern Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

Decided May 8, 2007

Matter of Elliott v Butler, 34 AD3d 878, reversed.

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Rodney Elliott, appellant pro se.

Andrew Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Kate H. Nepveu, Barbara D. Underwood and Daniel Smirlock of counsel), for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Albany County, for a traverse hearing. The parties' submissions on the motion to dismiss raise issues of fact requiring a traverse hearing.

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.