People v Villatoro (Cindy)

Annotate this Case
[*1] People v Villatoro (Cindy) 2018 NY Slip Op 51741(U) Decided on November 29, 2018 Appellate Term, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on November 29, 2018
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : JERRY GARGUILO, J.P., ANTHONY MARANO, BRUCE E. TOLBERT, JJ
2015-2777 S C

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

Cindy Villatoro, Appellant.

Scott Lockwood, for appellant. Suffolk County Attorney's Office (Dennis M. Brown and Drew W. Schirmer of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the District Court of Suffolk County, Suffolk County Traffic and Parking Violations Agency (Allen S. Mathers, J.H.O.), entered November 18, 2015. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, imposed a $50 civil liability, plus a $30 administrative fee, upon defendant as the owner of a vehicle which had failed to stop at a red light.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

This action was commenced to impose a civil liability upon defendant as the owner of a vehicle which had been recorded by a "traffic-control signal photo violation-monitoring" device failing to comply with a traffic-control indication in violation of Local Law No. 20 (2009) of the County of Suffolk, which established vehicle owner liability for failure to comply with traffic-control indications (see also Vehicle and Traffic Law §§ 1111-b, 1111 [d]). It was alleged in the notice of liability that, on August 27, 2015, at 8:27 a.m., defendant's vehicle was traveling northbound and did not stop at a red light at the intersection of Straight Path and Wellwood Avenue. Following a nonjury trial, the District Court of Suffolk County, Suffolk County Traffic and Parking Violations Agency, found defendant liable and imposed a civil liability upon her in the sum of $50, plus a $30 administrative fee.

Contrary to defendant's contention, the administrative fee imposed by the District Court of Suffolk County, Suffolk County Traffic and Parking Violations Agency, is authorized [*2]pursuant to chapter 818, article XI of the Code of Suffolk County and is not preempted by state law (see Municipal Home Rule Law § 10; People v Gray, 58 Misc 3d 155[A], 2018 NY Slip Op 50184[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2018]; see generally Guthart v Nassau County, 55 Misc 3d 827 [Sup Ct, Nassau County 2017]). To the extent the issue raised on appeal is considered a challenge to the constitutionality of Code of Suffolk County § 818-78, such a challenge is not properly before this court since Suffolk County must first be, and was not, provided with notice of the constitutional challenge (see CPLR 1012 [b] [2]).

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

GARGUILO, J.P., MARANO and TOLBERT, JJ., concur.



ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: November 29, 2018

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.