Sure Way NY, Inc. v Travelers Ins. Co.

Annotate this Case
[*1] Sure Way NY, Inc. v Travelers Ins. Co. 2018 NY Slip Op 51130(U) Decided on July 13, 2018 Appellate Term, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on July 13, 2018
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : MICHAEL L. PESCE, P.J., MICHELLE WESTON, BERNICE D. SIEGAL, JJ
2016-2079 K C

Sure Way NY, Inc., as Assignee of Fagan, Esther, Respondent,

against

Travelers Insurance Company, Appellant.

The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Duane Frankson of counsel), for appellant. Law Offices of Aloy O. Ibuzor (Damin J. Toell and Karina Barska of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Katherine A. Levine, J.), entered April 20, 2016. The order denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant appeals from an order of the Civil Court which, upon the application of the substantive law of Florida (see Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. [Stolarz-New Jersey Mfrs. Ins. Co.], 81 NY2d 219, 226 [1993]; Auten v Auten, 308 NY 155, 160-161 [1954]; Matter of Eagle Ins. Co. v Singletary, 279 AD2d 56, 60 [2000]), denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

A review of the record shows that defendant failed to meet its initial burden on its motion since its own submissions raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the assignor resided in New York or with the insured in Florida at the time of the accident (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]; see also Sandiford v Kahn, 84 AD3d 1209 [2011]).

Accordingly, the order is affirmed.

PESCE, P.J., WESTON and SIEGAL, JJ., concur.


ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: July 13, 2018

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.