Jacob Marion, LLC v Jones

Annotate this Case
[*1] Jacob Marion, LLC v Jones 2018 NY Slip Op 50199(U) Decided on February 9, 2018 Appellate Term, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on February 9, 2018
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : MICHAEL L. PESCE, P.J., MICHELLE WESTON, THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, JJ
2016-311 K C

Jacob Marion, LLC, Appellant,

against

J. Jones, Respondent.

Leon I. Behar, P.C. (Leon I. Behar), for appellant. South Brooklyn Legal Services (Nadya E. Rosen and Andrew A. Ortiz), for respondent. Consolidated

appeals from (1) an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Gary Franklin Marton, J.), dated July 29, 2015, deemed in part from a final judgment of that court entered April 1, 2016 (see CPLR 5501 [c]), and (2) an order of that court dated June 15, 2016. The final judgment, entered pursuant to so much of the order dated July 29, 2015 as granted tenant's motion for summary judgment, dismissed the petition in a holdover summary proceeding. The order dated July 29, 2015, insofar as directly appealed from, denied as moot landlord's cross motion for use and occupancy. The order dated June 15, 2016 denied landlord's motion for leave to renew its opposition to tenant's motion for summary judgment.

ORDERED that the order dated July 29, 2015, insofar as reviewed on direct appeal, the final judgment, and the order dated June 15, 2016 are affirmed, without costs.

The notice of termination and petition in this holdover proceeding allege the termination of a month-to-month tenancy and that the premises is not rent stabilized. By order dated July 29, 2015, the Civil Court granted tenant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the petition on the ground that the apartment was rent stabilized, and denied as moot landlord's cross motion for use and occupancy. Landlord's notice of appeal from the order dated July 29, 2015 is deemed in part to be from a final judgment, entered pursuant to the order, dismissing the petition (see CPLR 5501 [c]). Following the entry of the final judgment, landlord moved, on the ground of newly discovered evidence (see CPLR 2221 [e]), for leave to renew its opposition to tenant's summary [*2]judgment motion, arguing that tenant had no lease at all, which motion was denied by order dated June 15, 2016.

For the reasons stated in Jacob Marion, LLC, v Hamilton "Doe" (— Misc 3d &mdash, 2018 NY Slip Op — [appeal No. 2015-2801 K C], decided herewith), the order dated July 29, 2015, insofar as reviewed on direct appeal, the final judgment, and the order dated June 15, 2016 are affirmed.

PESCE, P.J., WESTON and ALIOTTA, JJ., concur.


ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: February 09, 2018

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.