Arguelles, M.D., P.C. v American Tr. Ins. Co.

Annotate this Case
[*1] Arguelles, M.D., P.C. v American Tr. Ins. Co. 2016 NY Slip Op 51544(U) Decided on October 11, 2016 Appellate Term, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on October 11, 2016
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ.
2014-833 Q C

Arguelles, M.D., P.C., as Assignee of Joseph Estimem, Appellant,

against

American Transit Ins. Co., Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Richard G. Latin, J.), entered March 26, 2014. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the branches of plaintiff's motion seeking summary judgment on the second through sixth causes of action and granted the branches of defendant's cross motion seeking summary judgment dismissing those causes of action.

ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is modified by providing that the branches of defendant's cross motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the second through sixth causes of action are denied; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Civil Court as denied the branches of plaintiff's motion seeking summary judgment on the second through sixth causes of action, and granted the branches of defendant's cross motion seeking summary judgment dismissing those causes of action on the ground that they were premature because plaintiff had failed to provide requested verification.

For the reasons stated in Performance Plus Med., P.C., as Assignee of Melanna Luckie v Nationwide Ins. (___ Misc 3d ___, 2016 NY Slip Op ______ [appeal No. 2013-2766 Q C], decided herewith), the order, insofar as appealed from, is modified by providing that the branches of defendant's cross motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the second through sixth causes of action are denied.

Pesce, P.J., Aliotta and Solomon, JJ., concur.


Decision Date: October 11, 2016

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.