Calandro v Torres

Annotate this Case
[*1] Calandro v Torres 2005 NY Slip Op 51895(U) [10 Misc 3d 127(A)] Decided on November 4, 2005 Appellate Term, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on November 4, 2005
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE TERM: 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: PESCE, P.J., WESTON PATTERSON and GOLIA, JJ.
2004-1680 K C

William Calandro, Appellant,

against

Rosemary Torres, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Loren Baily Schiffman, J.), entered June 14, 2004. The judgment, insofar as appealed from on the ground of inadequacy, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $700.


Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. [*2]

A review of the record indicates that the determination of the court below clearly
could have been reached under a fair interpretation of the evidence and, thus, will not be disturbed on appeal (see Perez v Garcia, 304 AD2d 544 [2003]; Jones v Hart, 233 AD2d 297 [1996]).

Decision Date: November 04, 2005

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.