George v Greenpath Credit Counseling Servs.

Annotate this Case
[*1] George v Greenpath Credit Counseling Servs. 2005 NY Slip Op 51523(U) [9 Misc 3d 128(A)] Decided on September 20, 2005 Appellate Term, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on September 20, 2005
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE TERM: 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: September 20, 2005 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE TERM : 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS PRESENT : RUDOLPH, P.J., ANGIOLILLO and TANENBAUM, JJ.
2004-1795 N C

James B. George, Appellant,

against

Greenpath Credit Counseling Services, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the District Court of Nassau County, Fourth District (Norman Janowitz, J.), entered May 12, 2004. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the complaint.


Judgment unanimously reversed without costs and judgment directed to be entered in favor of plaintiff in the principal sum of $25.

Plaintiff commenced the instant small claims action against defendant, a credit counseling organization. Although the record reflects that defendant properly used plaintiff's payments to pay plaintiff's creditors, it also indicates that while defendant was contractually entitled to collect a $100 set-up fee, it collected $125 from plaintiff as the set-up fee. In order to render substantial justice between the parties in accordance with the rules and principles of substantive law (see UDCA 1807), plaintiff is entitled to a judgment in the principal sum of $25.
Decision Date: September 20, 2005

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.