People v Ventura (Jose)

Annotate this Case
[*1] People v Ventura (Jose) 2018 NY Slip Op 50679(U) Decided on May 14, 2018 Appellate Term, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on May 14, 2018
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Shulman P.J., Gonzalez, Edmead, JJ.
570500/16

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

Jose Ventura, Defendant-Appellant.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Kate Paek, J.), rendered June 29, 2016, convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of exposure of a person, and imposing sentence.

Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (Kate Paek, J.), rendered June 29, 2016, affirmed.

Application of appellant's counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders, and upon an independent review of the record, agree that there is no valid appealable issue that could be raised on appeal.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: May 14, 2018

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.