Johnson v Eurotec Kitchen & Design, Inc.

Annotate this Case
[*1] Johnson v Eurotec Kitchen & Design, Inc. 2017 NY Slip Op 50461(U) Decided on April 12, 2017 Appellate Term, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on April 12, 2017
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Lowe, III, P.J., Ling-Cohan, Gonzalez, JJ.
570058/17

Mary Ann Johnson, Plaintiff-Respondent,

against

Eurotec Kitchen & Design, Inc. d/b/a Alpine Kitchen & Bath, Defendant-Appellant.

Defendant appeals from an order of the Small Claims Part of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Erika M. Edwards, J.), entered August 25, 2016, which denied its motion to vacate a default judgment.

Per Curiam.

Order (Erika M. Edwards, J.), entered August 25, 2016, reversed, without costs, motion granted, default judgment vacated, and matter remanded for further proceedings.

Given the judicial preference for resolving cases on the merits (see Chevalier v 368 E. 148th St. Assoc., LLC, 80 AD3d 411, 413-414 [2011]), the existence of a possible meritorious defense to plaintiff's small claims action, and the absence of any indication that defendant's isolated default in appearance was willful or deliberate (see Cheri Rest. Inc. v Eoche, 144 AD3d 578, 580 [2016]), we exercise our discretion to relieve defendant of its default.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


I concurI concurI concur
Decision Date: April 12, 2017

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.