Okslen Acupuncture P.C. v Unitrin Advantage Ins. Co.

Annotate this Case
[*1] Okslen Acupuncture P.C. v Unitrin Advantage Ins. Co. 2014 NY Slip Op 51292(U) Decided on August 22, 2014 Appellate Term, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on August 22, 2014
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Schoenfeld, J.P., Hunter, Jr., Ling-Cohan,JJ.
570047/14

Okslen Acupuncture P.C. a/a/o Denvil B. Cleghorn, Plaintiff-Appellant, -

against

Unitrin Advantage Ins. Co., Defendant-Respondent.

Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Robert R. Reed, J.), entered November 26, 2012, which conditionally granted defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint unless plaintiff complied with defendant's notice of deposition.

Per Curiam.

Order (Robert R. Reed, J.), entered November 26, 2012, reversed, with $10 costs, and defendant's motion denied. (See Okselen Acupuncture P.C. v Unitrin Advantage Ins. Co., appeal numbered 14-205, decided herewith.)

THIS CONSTITUTES THE ORDER OF THE COURT.


I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: August 22, 2014

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.