Allen v Allen
Annotate this CaseDecided on December 3, 2010
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Shulman, J.P., McKeon, Schoenfeld, JJ
570157/10.
Walter Allen, Plaintiff
and Annette Allen, Plaintiff-Appellant
against
Lawrence J. Mainiero, Defendant-Respondent.
Plaintiff Annette Allen appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York,
Bronx County (Nelida Malave-Gonzalez, J.), dated June 23, 2009, which denied her motion to
vacate her default in appearing for a court conference.
Per Curiam.
Order (Nelida Malave-Gonzalez, J.), dated June 23, 2009, reversed, without costs, motion granted, complaint reinstated and matter remanded for further proceedings.
In light of the particular facts of this action to recover damages for personal injuries plaintiff allegedly sustained in an automobile accident, Civil Court should have granted plaintiff's motion to vacate her default. Plaintiff, appearing pro se in the action at the time she failed to appear for a court conference, demonstrated a reasonable excuse for that default and a potentially meritorious claim. Notably, with respect to the merits of plaintiff's claim, Civil Court previously denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, finding triable issues of fact to exist regarding defendant's negligence and whether plaintiff sustained a "serious injury" within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Decision Date: December 03, 2010
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.