Matter of Russ v Annucci

Annotate this Case
Matter of Russ v Annucci 2015 NY Slip Op 09580 Decided on December 24, 2015 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: December 24, 2015
520361

[*1]In the Matter of BRYON K. RUSS SR., Petitioner,

v

ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Calendar Date: October 27, 2015
Before: Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Rose and Clark, JJ.

Bryon K. Russ Sr., Elmira, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Martin A. Hotvet of counsel), for respondent.



MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of the Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs placing petitioner in administrative segregation.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging his placement in administrative segregation following a hearing. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and that all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot (see e.g. Matter of Smith v

Prack, 131 AD3d 784 [2015]). We note that petitioner has no right to be restored to the status he enjoyed prior to the administrative segregation determination (see e.g. Matter of Folk v Annucci, 122 AD3d 977, 978 [2014]).

Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Rose and Clark, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs, but with disbursements in the amount of $60.92.



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.