Matter of Streeter v Annucci

Annotate this Case
Matter of Streeter v Annucci 2015 NY Slip Op 06540 Decided on August 13, 2015 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: August 13, 2015
520033

[*1]In the Matter of WARREN STREETER, Petitioner,

v

ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Calendar Date: June 8, 2015
Before: Peters, P.J., Egan Jr., Rose and Clark, JJ.

Warren Streeter, Coxsackie, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Martin A. Hotvet of counsel), for respondent.



MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a tier III disciplinary determination that found him guilty of possessing contraband and smuggling. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory surcharge will be refunded to petitioner's inmate account. Despite his request for additional relief, petitioner is not entitled to be restored to the status that he enjoyed prior to

the disciplinary determination (see Matter of Raduns v Prack, 122 AD3d 995, 995-996 [2014]; Matter of Harris v Prack, 122 AD3d 981, 981 [2014]). In view of this, and given that petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the matter must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of McCaskell v Department of Corr. & Community Supervision, 128 AD3d 1208, 1208-1209 [2015]; Matter of Bain v Annucci, 127 AD3d 1533, 1533 [2015]).

Peters, P.J., Egan Jr., Rose and Clark, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.