People v Vierno

Annotate this Case
People v Vierno 2015 NY Slip Op 06530 Decided on August 13, 2015 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: August 13, 2015
105714

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,

v

MICHAEL S. VIERNO, Appellant.

Calendar Date: June 8, 2015
Before: McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Rose and Lynch, JJ.

Rosemary Philips, Canton, for appellant.

Mary E. Rain, District Attorney, Canton (Ramy Louis of counsel), for respondent.



MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Richards, J.), rendered August 14, 2012, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted assault in the second degree.

In satisfaction of a one-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to attempted assault in the second degree and waived his right to appeal. He was released to probation pending sentencing and violated a condition of his release during this time. Nevertheless, County Court adhered to the plea bargain and sentenced him as a second felony offender to the minimum available sentence of 1½ to 3 years in prison with a recommendation for the shock incarceration program. He now appeals.

Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of her assignment of

representing defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record and counsel's brief, we agree. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed and counsel's request for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys , 113 AD2d 979, 980 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes , 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Rose and Lynch, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.