Matter of Cruz v Fischer

Annotate this Case
Matter of Cruz v Fischer 2008 NY Slip Op 09514 [57 AD3d 1055] December 4, 2008 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 11, 2009

In the Matter of Augustine Cruz, Petitioner, v Brian Fischer, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.

—[*1] Augustine Cruz, Pine City, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Following a physical altercation with another inmate, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with fighting, engaging in violent conduct, assaulting an inmate, possessing a weapon and creating a disturbance. A tier III disciplinary hearing ensued, at the conclusion of which petitioner was found guilty of all charges. That determination was administratively affirmed, prompting petitioner to commence this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking annulment. We now confirm.

Contrary to petitioner's assertion, the determination of guilt is supported by substantial evidence in the form of the misbehavior report, related documentation and photographs and testimony adduced at the hearing (see Matter of Shankle v Goord, 45 AD3d 1084, 1085 [2007]). Petitioner's denial of the allegations created a credibility issue for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Brown v Selsky, 49 AD3d 1108 [2008]). We have examined petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claims that the misbehavior report was defective and the hearing was untimely, and, to the extent preserved, find them to be unavailing. [*2]

Mercure, J.P., Carpinello, Rose, Malone Jr. and Kavanagh, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.