People v Courtney B. Douglas

Annotate this Case
People v Douglas 2003 NY Slip Op 19586 [2 AD3d 1057] December 18, 2003 Appellate Division, Third Department As corrected through Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 25, 2004

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Courtney B. Douglas, Appellant.

—Mercure, J.P. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Smith, J.), rendered May 17, 2001, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree and was sentenced, in accordance with the plea agreement, to 1 to 3 years in prison. The plea was entered into in satisfaction of a superior court information charging him with criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, a crime which he committed while awaiting sentencing on another charge, the facts of which are more fully set forth in People v Douglas (— AD3d — [decided herewith] ). Defendant's sole contention on appeal is that the sentence imposed is harsh and excessive. We disagree. Defendant committed the crime in violation of the no-arrest condition of a prior plea bargain. Given these circumstances, as well as the fact that defendant agreed to the sentence challenged on this appeal as part of a plea bargain, we find no extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction of the sentence in the interest of justice (see People v Samuel, 284 AD2d 654, 655 [2001]; People v Hicks, 265 AD2d 600, 601 [1999]).

Crew III, Peters, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.