People v Farrar

Annotate this Case
People v Farrar 2021 NY Slip Op 07554 Decided on December 29, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 29, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
JOSEPH J. MALTESE, J.P.
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
ANGELA G. IANNACCI
WILLIAM G. FORD, JJ.
2018-10771
(S.C.I. No. 1608/18)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Shawn Farrar, appellant.



Janet E. Sabel, New York, NY (Kristina Schwarz of counsel), for appellant.

Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (Johnnette Traill, Sharon Y. Brodt, and Russell Shapiro of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Danielle Hartman, J., at plea; Gia Morris, J., at sentence), rendered July 30, 2018, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, he is not entitled to vacatur of his conviction and dismissal of the accusatory instrument based upon the sentencing court's error in pronouncing the sentence (see People v Sparber, 10 NY3d 457, 471-472; People v Sturgis, 69 NY2d 816, 818). Since the defendant is not entitled to the only remedy he seeks on this appeal, we affirm the judgment.

MALTESE, J.P., DUFFY, IANNACCI and FORD, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.