US Bank N.A. v Dineen

Annotate this Case
US Bank N.A. v Dineen 2020 NY Slip Op 03043 Decided on May 27, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on May 27, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, J.P.
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ.
2018-11472
(Index No. 39895/09)

[*1]US Bank National Association, etc., respondent,

v

Margaret G. Dineen, etc., appellant, et al., defendants.



Charles Wallshein, Melville, NY, for appellant.

RAS Boriskin, LLC, Westbury, NY (Joseph F. Battista and Leah Lenz of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Margaret G. Dineen appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Thomas F. Whelan, J.), dated July 20, 2018. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted those branches of the plaintiff's motion which were for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against that defendant and for an order of reference.

ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and those branches of the plaintiff's motion which were for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant Margaret G. Dineen and for an order of reference are denied.

For reasons stated in Nationstar HECM Acquisition Trust 2015-2, Wilmington Sav. Fund Socy., FSB v Andrews (167 AD3d 1025), we reverse the order insofar as appealed from and deny those branches of the plaintiff's motion which were for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant Margaret G. Dineen and for an order of reference.

CHAMBERS, J.P., LEVENTHAL, DUFFY and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.