People v Valentin

Annotate this Case
People v Valentin 2019 NY Slip Op 06808 Decided on September 25, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on September 25, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, J.P.
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
SHERI S. ROMAN
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.
2017-12901
(Ind. No. 17-00305)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Jonathan Valentin, appellant.



Scott M. Bishop, White Plains, NY, for appellant.

Anthony A. Scarpino, Jr., District Attorney, White Plains, NY (Christine DiSalvo and William C. Milaccio of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Barbara Gunther Zambelli, J.), rendered November 9, 2017, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, and unlawfully fleeing a police officer, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that his plea of guilty was not knowing and voluntary because the County Court failed to advise him, at the time of his plea, that it would issue an order of protection in favor of the victims, is without merit (see People v Deal, 115 AD3d 975, 976; People v Beckers, 94 AD3d 774; People v Margillo, 69 AD3d 655; People v Dixon, 16 AD3d 517).

The defendant contends that his appeal waiver was invalid, and that the invalidity of the appeal waiver nullifies the entire plea agreement. Contrary to the defendant's contention, his appeal waiver was valid (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337, 341-342; People v Moye, 170 AD3d 1198; People v Ramos, 164 AD3d 922; People v Martinez, 155 AD3d 1063). In any event, the invalidity of an appeal waiver does not automatically result in the vacatur of the underlying plea of guilty (see People v Johnson, 140 AD3d 1188, 1189; People v Pelaez, 100 AD3d 803, 804).

CHAMBERS, J.P., AUSTIN, ROMAN and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.