Matter of Wright v Irish

Annotate this Case
Matter of Wright v Irish 2017 NY Slip Op 08836 Decided on December 20, 2017 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 20, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
COLLEEN D. DUFFY, JJ.
2015-07548
(Index No. 2111/14)

[*1]In the Matter of John C. Wright, petitioner-respondent,

v

Jeffrey B. Irish, appellant, et al., respondent.



McCabe & Mack, LLP, Poughkeepsie, NY (Richard R. DuVall of counsel), for appellant.

Freeman Howard, P.C., Hudson, NY (Andrew B. Howard of counsel), for petitioner-respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

In a proceeding pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 1104-a for judicial dissolution of a closely held corporation, where there has been an election to purchase the shares owned by the petitioner pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 1118, Jeffrey B. Irish appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Forman, J.), dated June 11, 2015, which, upon a decision of the same court dated November 7, 2014, made after a hearing, and upon an order of the same court dated March 24, 2015, denying his motion pursuant to CPLR 4404(b) to set aside the decision, is in favor of the petitioner and against him in the principal sum of $3,833,558.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

"The determination of a fact-finder as to the value of a business, if it is within the range of testimony presented, will not be disturbed on appeal where the valuation rests primarily on the credibility of the expert witnesses and their valuation techniques" (Matter of USA Nutritionals, Inc., 306 AD2d 490, 491; see Matter of Adelstein v Finest Food Distrib. Co., N.Y., Inc., 116 AD3d 850, 851). Contrary to the contention of the appellant, the Supreme Court's determination as to the fair value of the petitioner's shares in the subject corporation is supported by the evidence (see Matter of Adelstein v Finest Food Distrib. Co., N.Y., Inc., 116 AD3d at 851; Matter of USA Nutritionals, 306 AD2d at 491).

LEVENTHAL, J.P., CHAMBERS, MALTESE and DUFFY, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.