Matter of Lucas v Murphy

Annotate this Case
Matter of Lucas v Murphy 2016 NY Slip Op 08523 Decided on December 21, 2016 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 21, 2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ.
2016-08615 DECISION, ORDER & JUDGMENT

[*1]In the Matter of Mowngly Lucas, petitioner,

v

Martin Murphy, etc., respondent.



Mowngly Lucas, East Elmhurst, NY, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, NY (Jonathan D. Conley of counsel), for respondent.



Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent Martin Murphy, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Kings County, to dismiss a criminal action entitled People v Lucas, commenced in that court under Indictment No. 4635/16, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

ORDERED that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022(b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only where there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see Matter of Legal Aid Soc. of Sullivan County v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12, 16). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.

RIVERA, J.P., CHAMBERS, MALTESE and LASALLE, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.