Matter of Miguel G. (Navil G.)

Annotate this Case
Matter of Miguel G. (Navil G.) 2015 NY Slip Op 08835 Decided on December 2, 2015 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 2, 2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
L. PRISCILLA HALL
JEFFREY A. COHEN
BETSY BARROS, JJ.
2014-10460
(Docket Nos. N-16258-12, N-16259-12)

[*1]In the Matter of Miguel G. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, petitioner- respondent;

and

Navil G. (Anonymous), respondent- appellant, et al., respondent. (Proceeding No. 1)



In the Matter of Saray G. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, petitioner- respondent;Navil G. (Anonymous), respondent- appellant, et al., respondent. (Proceeding No. 2)



Proskauer Rose LLP, New York, N.Y. (Andrea G. Miller and Kayirie Kuyumjian of counsel), for respondent-appellant.

Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Richard Dearing and Janet L. Zaleon of counsel), for petitioner-respondent.

Seymour W. James, Jr., New York, N.Y. (Tamara A. Steckler and Adira J. Hulkower of counsel), attorney for the children.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Alan Beckoff, J.), dated July 15, 2013. The order of disposition, insofar as appealed from, released the children Miguel G. and Saray G. to the custody of the mother with supervision by the Administration for Children's Services for a period of 12 months.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements, in light of our determination on a related appeal (see Matter of Miguel G., _____ AD3d _____ [Appellate Division Docket No. 2013-06193; decided herewith]).

DILLON, J.P., HALL, COHEN and BARROS, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.