Blinds To Go (U.S.), Inc. v Times Plaza Dev., L.P.

Annotate this Case
Blinds To Go (U.S.), Inc. v Times Plaza Dev., L.P. 2013 NY Slip Op 07704 Decided on November 20, 2013 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 20, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
PETER B. SKELOS
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
L. PRISCILLA HALL, JJ.
2013-00431
(Index No. 41932/03)

[*1]Blinds To Go (U.S.), Inc., respondent,

v

Times Plaza Development, L.P., appellant.




Kenneth J. Glassman, New York, N.Y., for appellant.
Westerman Ball Ederer Miller & Sharfstein, LLP, Uniondale,
N.Y. (Richard Gabriele of counsel), for
respondent.


DECISION & ORDER

In an action to recover damages for breach of a lease, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), dated November 28, 2012, which denied its motion for leave to amend its answer.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court properly denied its motion for leave to amend its answer to assert additional affirmative defenses and counterclaims, as they were either palpably insufficient or patently devoid of merit (see T & V Constr., Inc. v Calapai, 90 AD3d 908, 909; G.K. Alan Assoc., Inc. v Lazzari, 44 AD3d 95, 99, affd 10 NY3d 941).
RIVERA, J.P., SKELOS, CHAMBERS and HALL, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.