Matter of Tsulyn A. (Deborah A.)

Annotate this Case
Matter of Tsulyn A. (Deborah A.) 2013 NY Slip Op 08074 Decided on December 4, 2013 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 4, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
DANIEL D. ANGIOLILLO
SHERI S. ROMAN
SANDRA L. SGROI, JJ.
2012-07731
2013-01008
(Docket No. N-11437/09)

[*1]In the Matter of Tsulyn A. (Anonymous). Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-respondent;

and

Deborah A. (Anonymous), appellant, et al., respondent.




George E. Reed, Jr., White Plains, N.Y., for appellant.
Robert F. Meehan, County Attorney, White Plains, N.Y.
(Christopher J. Inzero of counsel), for
petitioner-respondent.
Anne R. Mueller, West Harrison, N.Y., attorney for the child.


DECISION & ORDER

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of two orders of the Family Court, Westchester County (Lammers, Ct. Atty. Ref.), entered June 22, 2012, and January 11, 2013, respectively, as, after permanency hearings, continued the permanency goal of adoption with regard to the subject child.

ORDERED that the appeal from so much of the order entered June 22, 2012, as continued the permanency goal of adoption with regard to the subject child is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as that portion of the order was superseded by so much of the order entered January 11, 2013, as continued the permanency goal of adoption with regard to the subject child; and it is further,

ORDERED that the order entered January 11, 2013, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court's determination that the petitioner proved by a preponderance of the evidence that a continuation of the permanency goal of adoption was in the best interests of the subject child has a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Matter of Duane S., Jr. [Duane S.], 103 AD3d 645; Matter of Acension C.L. [Jesate J.], 96 AD3d 1059, 1060).
DILLON, J.P., ANGIOLILLO, ROMAN and SGROI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.