People v Kissoon

Annotate this Case
People v Kissoon 2013 NY Slip Op 07503 Decided on November 13, 2013 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 13, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
RANDALL T. ENG, P.J.
PETER B. SKELOS
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL
SANDRA L. SGROI, JJ.
2011-10026
(Ind. No. 23/10)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Hiralal Kissoon, appellant.




Steven Banks, New York, N.Y. (Joanne Legano Ross of
counsel), for appellant.
Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y.
(John M. Castellano and Jennifer
Hagan of counsel; Lorrie A. Zinno
on the memorandum), for
respondent.


DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hirsh, J.), imposed September 26, 2011, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

As the People correctly concede, the defendant's waiver of his right to appeal was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, contrary to the defendant's contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
ENG, P.J., SKELOS, LEVENTHAL and SGROI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.