People ex rel. Brill v Commissioner of N.Y. City Dept. of Correction

Annotate this Case
People ex rel. Brill v Commissioner of the N.Y. City Dept. of Correction 2009 NY Slip Op 09691 [68 AD3d 1143] December 22, 2009 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 10, 2010

The People of the State of New York ex rel. Peter Brill, on Behalf of Emanuel Savarese, Petitioner,
v
Commissioner of the New York City Department of Correction, et al., Respondents.

—[*1] Karasyk & Moschella, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Peter Brill pro se, of counsel), for petitioner.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Danit Almong of counsel), respondent pro se.

Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application for bail reduction upon Kings County indictment No. 11064/08, to release the defendant on his own recognizance or, in the alternative, fixing bail.

Adjudged that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The determination of the Supreme Court, Kings County, was not an improvident exercise of discretion, and did not violate "constitutional or statutory standards" (People ex rel. Klein v Krueger, 25 NY2d 497, 499 [1969]; see People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson, 48 NY2d 230 [1979]). Santucci, J.P., Dickerson, Eng and Chambers, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.