People v Tankleff

Annotate this Case
People v Tankleff 2007 NY Slip Op 10188 [46 AD3d 846] December 18, 2007 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 13, 2008

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Martin Tankleff, Appellant.

—[*1] Baker Botts LLP, Washington, D.C. (Stephen L. Braga, Courtney G. Saleski, and Sheila Kadagathur of counsel), Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP, Washington, D.C. (Barry J. Pollack and Dawn E. Murphy-Johnson of counsel), Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Washington, D.C. (Jennifer M. O'Connor, Brent Gurney and Roberto Gonzalez of counsel), Law Offices of Bruce A. Barket, P.C., Garden City, N.Y., Clifford Chance US LLP, New York, N.Y. (Warren Feldman and Scott Splittgerber of counsel), and Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, New York, N.Y. (Mark F. Pomerantz of counsel), for appellant (one brief filed).

Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Leonard Lato of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.10 (5) from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Braslow, J.), dated March 17, 2006, which denied, without a hearing, his motion pursuant to CPL 440.30 (1-a), inter alia, for forensic DNA testing of certain evidence recovered by the police.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, the motion is granted, and the People are directed to provide the defendant's counsel with access to trial exhibit 125b, consisting of fingernail clippings and scrapings recovered from both hands of Arlene Tankleff, and the known exemplars of the DNA of the defendant, Joseph Creedon, Peter Kent, Jerry Steuerman, and Arlene Tankleff for the purpose of performing forensic DNA testing, within 30 days after service upon the People of a copy of this decision and order.

Under the circumstances of this case, the County Court improperly denied the defendant's motion pursuant to CPL 440.30 (1-a) for access to trial exhibit 125b, consisting of fingernail clippings from both hands of Arlene Tankleff and scrapings therefrom, as well as the [*2]known exemplars of the DNA of the defendant, Joseph Creedon, Peter Kent, Jerry Steuerman, and Arlene Tankleff (see People v Pitts, 4 NY3d 303, 311 [2005]; People v Keene, 4 AD3d 536, 537 [2004]). Rivera, J.P., Krausman, Florio and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.