People v Nowell

Annotate this Case
People v Nowell 2007 NY Slip Op 09801 [46 AD3d 707] December 11, 2007 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 13, 2008

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Kevin Nowell, Appellant.

—[*1] Marianne Karas, Armonk, N.Y., for appellant.

Janet DiFiore, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Lois C. Valerio and Anthony J. Servino of counsel; Ashely C. Allen on the brief), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Loehr, J.), rendered September 13, 2006, convicting him of rape in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing a sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's claim that he did not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily enter his guilty plea is unpreserved for appellate review since he did not move to withdraw his plea or vacate the judgment of conviction in the County Court (see People v Clarke, 93 NY2d 904, 905 [1999]; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636, 637 [1983]; People v Tinsley, 32 AD3d 447 [2006]; People v Ackridge, 31 AD3d 654 [2006]). In any event, the defendant's plea of guilty was voluntarily entered in the presence of competent counsel after the court had advised him of the consequences of the plea and after the court had conducted a sufficient inquiry to assure itself that the defendant was pleading guilty because he was in fact guilty (see People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536 [1993]; People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9 [1983]; People v Rizzo, 38 AD3d 571 [2007]; People v Mead, 27 AD3d 767 [2006]). Spolzino, J.P., Skelos, Lifson and McCarthy, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.