Matter of Feliciano v Micheli-Hartford

Matter of Feliciano v Micheli-Hartford 2006 NY Slip Op 09621 [35 AD3d 739] December 19, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 14, 2007

In the Matter of John Feliciano, Appellant,
v
Kim Micheli-Hartford, Respondent.

—[*1]In a child visitation proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Lynaugh, J.), dated March 13, 2006, which, after a hearing, denied his petition to direct that the mother's visitation be supervised.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the father's contention, he failed to demonstrate a change in circumstances warranting modification of the visitation provisions of the stipulation agreement (see Matter of Abranko v Vargas, 26 AD3d 490 [2006]; Matter of Manos v Manos, 282 AD2d 749 [2001]; Matter of Brocher v Brocher, 213 AD2d 544 [1995]). Furthermore, the Family Court's determination that it would not be in the child's best interests to modify the mother's visitation has a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Matter of Abranko v Vargas, supra; Brocher v Brocher, supra).

The father's remaining contentions are without merit. Goldstein, J.P., Skelos, Lunn and Covello, JJ., concur.