Hamilton v Jam Roc Cafe, Inc.

Annotate this Case
Hamilton v Jam Roc Cafe, Inc. 2006 NY Slip Op 09166 [35 AD3d 365] December 5, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 14, 2007

Jahkysa Hamilton et al., Respondents,
v
Jam Roc Cafe, Inc., Appellant.

—[*1]In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rosengarten, J.), dated August 15, 2005, as denied that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the causes of action based upon common-law negligence.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the defendant failed to establish its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see CPLR 3212; Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851 [1985]). Goldstein, J.P., Rivera, Spolzino and Skelos, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.