New York Appellate Division, Second Department Decisions

Browse Opinions From the New York Appellate Division, Second Department

Recent Decisions From the New York Appellate Division, Second Department
People v Bostic
Date: March 26, 2025
Citation: 2025 NY Slip Op 01816
Docket Number: 2014-00573
People v Steward
Date: March 26, 2025
Citation: 2025 NY Slip Op 01825
Docket Number: 2018-03416
People v Jean-Jacques
Date: March 26, 2025
Citation: 2025 NY Slip Op 01819
Docket Number: 2018-05449
People v Lexune
Date: March 26, 2025
Citation: 2025 NY Slip Op 01822
Docket Number: 2018-08412
Torkin v Susac
Date: March 26, 2025
Citation: 2025 NY Slip Op 01833
Docket Number: 2019-05307
Torkin v Susac
Date: March 26, 2025
Citation: 2025 NY Slip Op 01834
Docket Number: 2019-08661
People v Trent
Date: March 26, 2025
Citation: 2025 NY Slip Op 01826
Docket Number: 2019-11273
People v Petty
Date: March 26, 2025
Citation: 2025 NY Slip Op 01824
Docket Number: 2020-02098
Last Chance Funding, Inc. v Tom Agler Livestock, LLC
Date: March 26, 2025
Citation: 2025 NY Slip Op 01794
Docket Number: 2020-09161
Matter of Borgia v SCO Family of Servs.
Date: March 26, 2025
Citation: 2025 NY Slip Op 01800
Docket Number: 2020-09390
People v Moses
Date: March 26, 2025
Citation: 2025 NY Slip Op 01823
Docket Number: 2021-00295
McCall v Alma Realty Corp.
Date: March 26, 2025
Citation: 2025 NY Slip Op 01797
Docket Number: 2021-05753
Matter of Borgia v SCO Family of Servs.
Date: March 26, 2025
Citation: 2025 NY Slip Op 01801
Docket Number: 2021-08843
Rhymes v Elrac, LLC
Date: March 26, 2025
Citation: 2025 NY Slip Op 01830
Docket Number: 2022-00044
Torkin v Susac
Date: March 26, 2025
Citation: 2025 NY Slip Op 01835
Docket Number: 2022-00180
The opinions published on Justia State Caselaw are sourced from individual state court sites. These court opinions may not be the official published versions, and you should check your local court rules before citing to them. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or the information linked to on the state site.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.