Matter of Clark v Clark

Annotate this Case
Matter of Clark v Clark 2022 NY Slip Op 04880 Decided on August 4, 2022 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on August 4, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, NEMOYER, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
888/21 CAF 21-00264

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF DIANNE CLARK AND DAVID CLARK, PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS,

v

DEXTER D. CLARK, RESPONDENT, AND CYNTHIA CLIFFORD-CLARK, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.



PETER J. DIGIORGIO, JR., UTICA, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

THERESA GIROUARD, ROME, FOR PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS.

MARK MALAK, CLINTON, FOR RESPONDENT.

MICHAEL J. LAUCELLO, CLINTON, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD.



Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (James R. Griffith, J.), entered October 5, 2020 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, inter alia, granted petitioners visitation with the subject child.

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on July 27 and August 1, 2022,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: August 4, 2022

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.