Dietz v Sunbelt Bus. Brokers of W. N.Y., Inc.
Annotate this Case
Dietz v Sunbelt Bus. Brokers of W. N.Y., Inc.
2021 NY Slip Op 03766
Decided on June 11, 2021
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on June 11, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
639 CA 20-01064
[*1]ERIC DIETZ, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v
SUNBELT BUSINESS BROKERS OF WESTERN NEW YORK, INC., CALVIN LAWSON, LIDIA COUZO, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Decided on June 11, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
639 CA 20-01064
[*1]ERIC DIETZ, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v
SUNBELT BUSINESS BROKERS OF WESTERN NEW YORK, INC., CALVIN LAWSON, LIDIA COUZO, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
LEROI C. JOHNSON, BUFFALO, FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
RUPP BAASE PFALZGRAF CUNNINGHAM LLC, BUFFALO (JAMES R. O'CONNOR OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Mark J. Grisanti, A.J.), entered January 30, 2020. The judgment, among other things, awarded plaintiff $32,000 against defendants-appellants.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed with costs.
Entered: June 11, 2021
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.