Dowell v EST Trish, LLC

Annotate this Case
Dowell v EST Trish, LLC 2021 NY Slip Op 07460 Decided on December 23, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 23, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND BANNISTER, JJ.
1135 CA 20-00588

[*1]JOSEPH A. DOWELL AND LINDA DOWELL, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v

EST TRISH, LLC, DOING BUSINESS AS STANLEY STEEMER OF SYRACUSE, STANLEY STEEMER INTERNATIONAL, INC., DICKINSON ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, LLC, ST. JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL HEALTH CENTER, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



MCMAHON KUBLICK, P.C., SYRACUSE (W. ROBERT TAYLOR OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.

SMITH, SOVIK, KENDRICK & SUGNET, P.C., SYRACUSE (THOMAS J. DEBERNARDIS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS EST TRISH, LLC, DOING BUSINESS AS STANLEY STEEMER OF SYRACUSE, AND STANLEY STEEMER INTERNATIONAL, INC.

PILLINGER, MILLER & TARALLO, SYRACUSE (MARIA T. MASTRIANO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT DICKINSON ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, LLC.

GALE GALE & HUNT, LLC, FAYETTEVILLE (ANDREW R. BORELLI OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT ST. JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL HEALTH CENTER.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Donald A. Greenwood, J.), entered September 6, 2019. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted the motions of defendants EST Trish, LLC, doing business as Stanley Steemer of Syracuse, Stanley Steemer International, Inc., Dickinson Environmental Consulting, LLC, and St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs' complaint as against them.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

Entered: December 23, 2021

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.