Robshaw & Voelkl, P.C. v Stankiewicz
Annotate this CaseDecided on December 23, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., LINDLEY, NEMOYER, AND BANNISTER, JJ.
1069 CA 21-00242
[*1]ROBSHAW & VOELKL, P.C., PLAINTIFF,
v
JENNIFER KRYSTYNA STANKIEWICZ, ALSO KNOWN AS JENNIFER STANKIEWICZ RODRIGUEZ, DEFENDANT.
JENNIFER KRYSTYNA STANKIEWICZ, ALSO KNOWN AS JENNIFER STANKIEWICZ RODRIGUEZ, THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT,JEFFREY F. VOELKL, ESQ., LL.M, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT.
SMITH, SOVIK, KENDRICK & SUGNET, P.C., SYRACUSE (KAREN GUYDER FELTER OF COUNSEL), FOR THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT.
BOUVIER LAW, LLP, BUFFALO (JOHN P. LUHR OF COUNSEL), FOR THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Frank A. Sedita, III, J.), entered May 16, 2019. The order, among other things, granted in part the third-party defendant's motion to dismiss the third-party complaint.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.
Entered: December 23, 2021
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.