Gumas v Niagara Frontier Tr. Metro Sys., Inc.
Annotate this CaseDecided on December 23, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND BANNISTER, JJ.
766 CA 19-01457
[*1]YVETTE GUMAS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v
NIAGARA FRONTIER TRANSIT METRO SYSTEMS, INC. AND NIAGARA FRONTIER TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
GOLDBERG SEGALLA LLP, BUFFALO (MEGHAN M. BROWN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
CAMPBELL & ASSOCIATES, EDEN (R. COLIN CAMPBELL OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Catherine R. Nugent Panepinto, J.), entered August 1, 2019. The order denied defendants' motion to set aside the jury verdict.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Gumas v Niagara Frontier Tr. Metro Sys., Inc. ([appeal No. 1] — AD3d — [Dec. 23, 2020] [4th Dept 2020]).
Entered: December 23, 2020
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.