Rudy v Altmar-Parish-Williamstown Cent. Sch. Dist.

Annotate this Case
Rudy v Altmar-Parish-Williamstown Cent. Sch. Dist. 2020 NY Slip Op 07739 Decided on December 23, 2020 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 23, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., TROUTMAN, WINSLOW, BANNISTER, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.
557 CA 19-02100

[*1]TARA K. RUDY AND LORNE M. RUDY, CLAIMANTS-RESPONDENTS,

v

ALTMAR-PARISH-WILLIAMSTOWN CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)



MCGIVNEY, KLUGER, CLARK & INTOCCIA, P.C., SYRACUSE (LEIGH A. LIEBERMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

ROBERT E. LAHM, PLLC, SYRACUSE (JOSHUA M. GILLETTE OF COUNSEL), FOR CLAIMANTS-RESPONDENTS.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Deborah H. Karalunas, J.), entered May 15, 2019. The order, among other things, granted claimants' application for leave to serve a late notice of claim.

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on October 15, 2020,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: December 23, 2020

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.