Matter of Inzer v West Brighton Fire Dept., Inc.
Annotate this Case
Matter of Inzer v West Brighton Fire Dept., Inc.
2019 NY Slip Op 06995
Decided on September 27, 2019
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on September 27, 2019
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, NEMOYER, AND TROUTMAN, JJ. (Filed Sept. 27, 2019.)
MOTION NO. (285/19) CA 18-00329.
[*1]IN THE MATTER OF PAT A. INZER, BRUCE HALL, DEAN C. MARSHALL, III, KEVIN HALL, JAMES QUINN, FOR JUDICIAL DISSOLUTION OF WEST BRIGHTON FIRE DEPARTMENT, INC., PURSUANT TO NOT-FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION LAW § 1102, AND TOWN OF BRIGHTON, PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS,
v
WEST BRIGHTON FIRE DEPARTMENT, INC., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, AND ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT.
Decided on September 27, 2019
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, NEMOYER, AND TROUTMAN, JJ. (Filed Sept. 27, 2019.)
MOTION NO. (285/19) CA 18-00329.
[*1]IN THE MATTER OF PAT A. INZER, BRUCE HALL, DEAN C. MARSHALL, III, KEVIN HALL, JAMES QUINN, FOR JUDICIAL DISSOLUTION OF WEST BRIGHTON FIRE DEPARTMENT, INC., PURSUANT TO NOT-FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION LAW § 1102, AND TOWN OF BRIGHTON, PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS,
v
WEST BRIGHTON FIRE DEPARTMENT, INC., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, AND ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Motion for reargument or leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
